How to Identify Underserved Markets for Your FMCG Product Using Geospatial Data 

How to Identify Underserved Markets for Your FMCG Product Using Geospatial Data 

Somewhere right now, there is a neighborhood with exactly the kind of consumers your product is built for: decent income, the right age profile, growing fast, and your brand has close to zero presence there. Nobody flagged it because nobody was looking at the right data to notice.  That is the core challenge with underserved markets: they rarely announce themselves. Finding them takes more than checking which cities your distributors already cover. 

What Underserved Actually Means 

It is tempting to define an underserved market simply as an area where your product is not sold. But that definition misses a lot of nuance. 
  • True whitespace: strong demographic and demand signals, but no meaningful distribution at all. This is the clearest opportunity. 
  • Weak format fit: your product is present, but only through outlet types that do not match how the local population actually shops, for example only in supermarkets in an area dominated by warung-based daily shopping. 
  • SKU mismatch: distribution exists, but the wrong pack sizes or variants are on the shelf for that area’s income profile and household composition. 
All three count as underserved in a real sense, but each requires a different fix. The first calls for new distribution. The second calls for a channel strategy shift. The third calls for assortment changes, not more outlets. 

The Data Layers That Reveal Underserved Markets 

Spotting any of these patterns requires looking at more than sales figures. The data layers that matter most are: 
  • Demographic fit: income level, household size, and age distribution compared against the profile of your existing best-performing markets. 
  • Mobility and consumption signals: how people move through an area and what kinds of destinations they frequent, which often hints at lifestyle and spending patterns before sales data ever shows it. 
  • Competitor saturation: how heavily competitors have already covered the area, since low competitor presence alongside strong demographic fit is a much stronger signal than low competitor presence alone. 
  • Existing distribution penetration: how many outlets in the area currently carry your product, and what types they are, compared to the total outlet universe there. 
No single layer tells the full story. An area can look demographically perfect and still be a poor opportunity if three competitors already dominate it. An area with no competitors might simply have no demand worth chasing.  This mirrors how researchers approach the same problem at a larger scale. A 2025 geospatial study built a national suitability model for retail expansion by combining population density, age structure, household size, and existing shop density into a single score, then flagged grid cells with strong suitability but few or no shops as priority opportunities, what the study called whitespots (Tudor, 2025). The same logic scales down naturally to a single FMCG brand evaluating sub-districts within a city. 

Spotting the Pattern: Demand Without Supply 

The clearest underserved markets show a specific pattern: demographic and mobility signals that closely resemble your strongest existing markets, combined with distribution penetration and competitor presence that are both low. When all four layers line up this way, the area is very likely leaving real, attainable demand on the table.  Figure 1: Ranking by Gap Score: a LOKASI Intelligence hexagon grid view of a Jakarta area, combining competitor POI, mobility, SES, and demographic layers to highlight the sub-areas with the strongest demand-to-supply gap.   When only some of the layers line up, like strong demographics but heavy competitor saturation, the opportunity is murkier and probably requires a different kind of entry strategy, focused on differentiation rather than simply showing up first.  The map above shows a sample LOKASI Intelligence output for a service area spanning South and Central Jakarta. Each hexagon’s shade reflects its combined opportunity score, built from food and beverage competitor POI density, a daily mobility heatmap, an SES index relative to the city average, and demographic age distribution. The numbered markers flag the hexagons with the strongest gap score, the cells where demand signals are highest relative to existing competitor coverage, turning the analysis into a ranked shortlist instead of a single yes or no answer.   

Common Pitfalls When Hunting for Underserved Markets 

A few habits lead teams to chase the wrong opportunities: 
  • Equating low sales with low demand: an area can show weak sales purely because distribution never reached it properly, not because consumers there do not want the product. 
  • Equating no competitors with no demand: sometimes an area is genuinely empty of competition because there genuinely is not enough demand to support a presence. Distinguishing these two cases is exactly what the demographic and mobility layers are for. 
  • Treating a city or region as one unit: a city can be underserved in some sub-districts and saturated in others. Aggregating to the city level hides exactly the contrast you are trying to find. The same German study found that supply gaps showed up just as often in smaller towns and peri-urban districts as in big cities, precisely because city-level analysis would have masked them (Tudor, 2025). 

From Insight to Market Entry Plan 

Once a genuinely underserved area is identified, the next step is translating the insight into an entry plan: which channel types to prioritize first, which SKUs fit the local profile, and which distributor or sales team is best positioned to cover it. Location intelligence helps identify where to look. The commercial plan still has to define how to show up once you get there. Several LOKASI features map directly onto these decisions: 
  • Outlet and channel mapping: POI data showing which channel types, from warung to minimarkets to supermarkets, already dominate a sub-area, pointing to which channel to prioritize first. 
  • SES segmentation: spending tier data by sub-area, helping match pack size and price point to what the local population can actually afford 
  • Mobility and territory mapping: daily movement data that helps define a realistic coverage boundary for whichever distributor or sales team takes on the area. 
Want to see whether there’s an underserved market hiding in your current footprint? Bvarta’s team can run a demand-versus-coverage comparison across your target regions.   

FAQ 

How is an underserved market different from a simple distribution gap? 

A distribution gap usually refers to a specific outlet or cluster of outlets within an area you already operate in that should be carrying your product but is not. An underserved market is broader: it can include entire sub-districts or regions where your overall presence, format, or assortment does not match local demand, even if a handful of outlets there technically carry your product. 

Can a market be underserved even if competitors are already present there? 

Yes. If competitor coverage is light relative to the area’s demographic and demand potential, there can still be meaningful room to enter or expand. The key is comparing competitor saturation against demand strength rather than treating any competitor presence as a reason to avoid the area entirely. 

How do you tell the difference between an underserved market and one with genuinely low demand? 

Demographic and mobility data are the deciding factor. If an area’s income level, age profile, and movement patterns closely resemble markets where your product already performs well, low sales there are more likely a distribution problem. If those signals look weak across the board, low sales more likely reflect low demand. 

How often should underserved market analysis be repeated? 

At least annually for most FMCG categories, since new residential developments, infrastructure changes, and shifting demographics can open up new pockets of demand fairly quickly. Categories tied to fast-changing urban growth, like areas near new transit lines, may benefit from more frequent checks. 

References 

Tudor, C. (2025). A Geospatial Framework for Retail Suitability Modelling and Opportunity Identification in Germany. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 14(9), 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14090342 
Related Posts